Daniel S. Brookins
- Partner
My admin
- Emily Davis
industries
practices
Employment Litigation
- Represented numerous companies in collective action lawsuits brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
- Represented automative dealership in a benefits dispute; successfully obtained dismissal with prejudice in favor of the company.
- Represented pharmaceutical company in a retaliation suit brought by former executive; successfully obtained summary judgment in favor of the company.
- Represented agricultural equipment retailer in a discrimination and breach of contract suit brought by a former employee; successfully obtained summary disposition on all claims in favor of the company.
- Represented public university in a disability discrimination suit brought by a former student; successfully obtain
Employment Litigation
- Represented numerous companies in collective action lawsuits brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
- Represented automative dealership in a benefits dispute; successfully obtained dismissal with prejudice in favor of the company.
- Represented pharmaceutical company in a retaliation suit brought by former executive; successfully obtained summary judgment in favor of the company.
- Represented agricultural equipment retailer in a discrimination and breach of contract suit brought by a former employee; successfully obtained summary disposition on all claims in favor of the company.
- Represented public university in a disability discrimination suit brought by a former student; successfully obtained dismissal in favor of the university.
- Represented energy company in an ERISA benefits suit; successfully obtained dismissal of the claims against the company.
- Represented mortgage lender in discrimination suits brought by former employees; successfully obtained multiple orders to dismiss and compel arbitration.
- Represented manufacturing company in wage and hour dispute; successfully obtained voluntary dismissal on behalf of the company.
Commercial Litigation
- Represented pool services company in a breach of contract dispute; prevailed, after a week-long jury trial, in defeating all claims brought against company and successfully obtained a half-million-dollar judgment in favor of company.
- Represented consumer products company in a breach of contract suit; successfully obtained an order compelling arbitration and dismissing the federal suit; successfully defended that order on appeal in the Fourth Circuit.
- Represented commercial business in Telephone Consumer Protection Act suit; successfully obtained voluntary dismissal on behalf of the company.
Appellate Litigation
- Lead counsel in a civil rights dispute; argued the case before the Tenth Circuit and obtained reversal of a key lower court ruling in a published Tenth Circuit decision. Hooks v. Atoki, 983 F.3d 1193 (10th Cir. 2020).
- Co-counsel on multiple employment, property, and other commercial appeals.
- Co-counsel for multiple amicus briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Panelist: “Administrative Agencies in a Post-Chevron World,” West Michigan Chapter Federal Bar Association Bench Bar Conference, Sept. 18-20, 2024, Thompsonville, Michigan
- Warner Labor and Employment Quarterly Webinar Series, Qtr 1: FLSA + Wage and Hour, January 30, 2024
- Panelist: “Administrative Agencies in a Post-Chevron World,” West Michigan Chapter Federal Bar Association Bench Bar Conference, Sept. 18-20, 2024, Thompsonville, Michigan
- Warner Labor and Employment Quarterly Webinar Series, Qtr 1: FLSA + Wage and Hour, January 30, 2024
- Warner Names Nine Attorneys as Partners
- Warner Attorneys Selected for Multiple Honors by Best Lawyers in America®
- Warner Attorneys Selected for Multiple Honors by Best Lawyers in America®
- Daniel S. Brookins Joins Warner
- No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: Uptick in FLSA Litigation Over Attendance Bonuses
- Supreme Court Expands Scope of Personal Jurisdiction Over Corporations
- Delaware Court Extends Oversight Duty to Officers in McDonald’s Case
- “A Responsible Approach to Safety Regulation in the Automobile Industry,” 85 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Arguendo 83 (2017)
- “Confusion in the Circuit Courts: How the Circuit Courts Are Solving the Mead-Puzzle by Avoiding It Altogether,” 85 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1484 (2017) (cited by Chief Justice Roberts in Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369, 405 n.7 (2024)).
- “A Responsible Approach to Safety Regulation in the Automobile Industry,” 85 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Arguendo 83 (2017)
- “Confusion in the Circuit Courts: How the Circuit Courts Are Solving the Mead-Puzzle by Avoiding It Altogether,” 85 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1484 (2017) (cited by Chief Justice Roberts in Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369, 405 n.7 (2024)).
