Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

On June 11, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit vacated a removal order, holding that a naturalized U.S. citizen could not be deported following denaturalization for fraud, where he failed to disclose a recent indictment on his citizenship application, because the conviction occurred after the defendant became a U.S. citizen.

core/paragraph

core/heading

Mr. Gonzalez immigrated to the U.S. in 1981 and became a permanent resident in 1989. Twenty years later, in March 2009, Mr. Gonzalez applied for citizenship, which was granted in October 2009. In June 2009, Mr. Gonzalez was indicted for sexual abuse of a child but was not convicted until after he became a citizen.

The case arose after the government revoked Mr. Gonzalez’s U.S. citizenship, arguing that Mr. Gonzalez had obtained his citizenship by fraud. Specifically, the government claimed that Mr. Gonzalez had committed fraud by failing to disclose on his citizenship application that he had recently been indicted for sexual abuse. After revoking his citizenship, the government next sought to deport Mr. Gonzalez under a statute that permits removal of “[a]ny alien” who is convicted of child abuse. The Sixth Circuit vacated that removal order and held that Mr. Gonzalez was not “an alien” at the time of his conviction and therefore was not removable under this statute.

The Sixth Circuit held that the government cannot deport a person under this statute (8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i)) for a conviction that occurred while the person was a U.S. citizen, even if that citizenship is later revoked. In reaching this conclusion, the court reasoned that the use of the word “alien” in the relevant statute did not apply to Mr. Gonzalez at the time of the conviction because he was a citizen. The court also considered the present-tense phrase “is convicted” which signaled that Congress meant the person must be an alien at the time of the conviction.

Individuals whose citizenship is revoked for fraud cannot be deported under criminal grounds of removability for convictions that occurred while they were citizens.

core/list-item

Defense counsel may be able to seek termination of pending removal proceedings for criminal conduct where the client was already naturalized when the conviction occurred.

Congress could choose to respond and amend the relevant statutes to allow for the removal of denaturalized persons for offenses committed at any time.

core/list

We continue to closely monitor the shifting landscape of criminal defense and immigration law to ensure our clients are informed and protected. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this eAlert — or any criminal or immigration-related matter — please don’t hesitate to contact one of our experienced attorneys: Madelaine Lane, Sarah Bileti, Adam Townshend, Charlie Quigg, Daniel Persinger, Christopher LeClair or Ayan Ajeen.

Associate

Ayan M. Ajeen

Senior Counsel

Sarah R. Bileti

Partner

Madelaine C. Lane

Christopher M. LeClair

Daniel C. “Dan” Persinger

Charles R. “Charlie” Quigg

Adam B. Townshend

Appellate and Supreme Court Practice

Immigration

White Collar Criminal Defense

Appeals Court Clarifies Limits on Deportation Following Denaturalization for Fraud

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000. 

Appeals Court Clarifies Limits on Deportation Following Denaturalization for Fraud

professionals