Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
June 11, 2014

COA holds that statute prohibits public employers from providing any type of wage increase without a collective bargaining agreement

In Bedford Public Schools v. Bedford Education Association, a teachers' union argued that a school board had improperly refused to increase certain teachers wages in accordance with completed graduate education - also known as a "lane change" increase.  At issue was a Michigan statute that prohibited public employers from making wage increases without a collective bargaining agreement, and in this case the relevant CBA had expired.  That statute specifically stated that the prohibition "includes increases that would result from wage step increases."  The union argued that by specifically extending the prohibition to one type of wage increase - step increases, the Legislature must have allowed other types of increases, such as "lane change" increases to continue.  The Court of Appeals disagreed, finding the statute's clear and unambiguous language prohibited any wage increases, including lane change increases.  The Court noted that the "step increase" clause was merely an illustrative example.  The Court also found that this interpretation of the statute was constitutional as it did not deprive any teachers of any vested rights, as the teachers simply had an expectation that the prior law that allowed such increases would continue.   

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -