Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
February 22, 2014

MSC holds that a purported father is not required to attest to his parentage under the Acknowledgement of Parentage Act

In In re E.R. Moles, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed by order, in lieu of granting leave to appeal. The Court held that under the Acknowledgement of Parentage Act, “an acknowledging father is not required to attest that he is the biological father.” Accordingly, the Court of Appeals “erred in concluding that the parties’ knowledge of the possibility that respondent was not the biological father of the child was sufficient to demonstrate either fraud or misrepresentation under MCL 722.1437(2).” The Court also held that the “circuit court similarly erred when, in partial reliance on the DNA identification profiling results, it granted the petition for revocation of the acknowledgment of parentage.” The Court then remanded the matter to the circuit court.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -