Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is a corporate law firm with over 230 attorneys serving clients in nine offices throughout Michigan. Among the largest law firms in Michigan, Warner works in virtually all areas of business law.

Michigan Law Firm - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

Although MCL 400.106(5) permits the state to recover the full amount of its Medicaid lien from the total amount of a settlement or judgment in a medical-related tort action, federal law limits recovery to the amount that is designated specifically for medical expenses, according to the Michigan Court of Appeals in <a href="http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov:81/OPINIONS/FINAL/COA/20170516_C329733_47_329733.OPN.PDF" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Neal v. Meridian Health Plan of Michigan</em>, No. 329733</a>.

contentpilot/introduction

MCL 400.106(5) contains no language limiting lien recovery to particular categories of damages; however, under the superseding federal law, the state is entitled to receive from a third party only the amount of a recipient’s medical care, not the amounts that a recipient may have received for other categories of losses. The Court rejected the trial court’s holding that the state could recover more than the amount designated in a settlement for medical expenses because the lien existed prior to the lawsuit, finding that only the proceeds recovered for the recipient’s medical expenses were subject to the lien.

core/paragraph

The Court addressed the potential for manipulation of allocations by parties attempting to settle without the approval of the medical lienholder by determining that either a judicial finding or approval of the allocation between medical and nonmedical expenses is required to determine the amount the lienholder will receive. Approval may arise from a jury verdict, a court decree, or a binding stipulation by the involved parties. The Court noted that a lienholder is not bound by a stipulated amount if it is not involved in the negotiations and does not agree to the stipulation. If a stipulated amount cannot be agreed to, then a judicial proceeding is required to determine the appropriate amount to be designated for medical expenses.

Ultimately, based on the court’s decision, states may not preempt the federal Medicaid anti-lien statute and may only recover up to the amount designated specifically as medical expenses from the settlement or judgment in a tort action.

Partner

Jason L. Byrne

Labor and Employment

COA: State recovery under Medicaid liens is limited by federal Medicaid anti-lien statute

Warner Norcross + Judd LLP is responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website. If you have any questions or comments about our website or our Privacy Policy please contact us at <a href="mailto:info@wnj.com">info@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2000. 

COA: State recovery under Medicaid liens is limited by federal Medicaid anti-lien statute

professionals