Gaëtan represents corporations, banks, and domestic and foreign governments in high-stakes appeals and critical motions, both in state and federal courts. Gaëtan currently serves on the Council for the Appellate Practice Section of the State Bar of Michigan and the Executive Committee for the ABA's Council of Appellate Lawyers. In 2009, Gaëtan was awarded Michigan's Distinguished Brief Award by a panel of jurists and professors for his amicus curiae brief to the Michigan Supreme Court on behalf of Michigan Defense Trial Counsel in support of Auto-Owners Insurance Company. Substantive areas of expertise include mining, contracts, environmental law, land use and zoning and the National Environmental Policy Act.

Gaëtan is also a regular contributor to the One Court of Justice Blog, the leading blog analyzing Michigan’s appellate courts. Please visit the Blog at www.ocjblog.com.

Michigan Supreme Court Advocates Guild 2011

Michigan Supreme Court Advocates Guild 2011

Representative Experience

  • State and Federal Appeals

    • Cooper v. Edgewater Bank, No. 296189, 2011 WL 2848782 (Mich. Ct. App. July 19, 2011) (persuaded the Court of Appeals to affirm the grant of summary disposition to Fifth Third Bank in a dispute with heirs over whether the bank properly changed the beneficiary designations on the decedent's certificates of deposit)
    • NDC of Sylvan, Ltd. v. Township of Sylvan, No. 2011 WL 1901805 (Mich. Ct. App. May 19, 2011) (successfully persuaded the Court of Appeals to reverse a $2.4 million judgment against Sylvan Township and to vacate a permanent injunction that would have cost Sylvan Township an additional $3.4 million, in a dispute over $8 million in special assessments)
    • National Wildlife Federation v. Department of Natural Resources, No. 293779, 2011 WL 1004525 (Mich. Ct. App. Mar. 22, 2011)
    • Stout Tool Corp. v. Kane, 488 Mich. 869, 788 N.W.2d 420 (2010) (successfully persuaded the Michigan Supreme Court to deny leave to appeal from enforcement of a settlement agreement)
    • Isom v. NE Lots LLC, No. 288378, 2010 WL 143470 (Mich. Ct. App. Jan. 14, 2010) (persuaded the Michigan Court of Appeals to affirm a declaration that the intestate heirs' rights to share in the proceeds of a million-dollar estate through a settlement agreement with the testate heir were not conveyed in quit-claim deeds purporting to assign their rights to the proceeds of the estate)
    • United States v. Huntington National Bank, 574 F.3d 329 (6th Cir. 2009) (persuaded the Sixth Circuit to reverse and remand an adverse decision in a three-quarter-million-dollar ancillary criminal forfeiture proceeding)
    • Kyser v. Kasson Township, 786 N.W.2d 543 (Mich. 2010) (filed amicus brief on behalf of Michigan Aggregates Association in high-stakes challenge to constitutional zoning/mining standards that had not been reviewed by the Michigan Supreme Court in 25 years) (Amicus Brief)
    • Benefiel v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co., 759 N.W.2d 814 (Mich. 2008) (as amicus curiae, successfully persuaded the Michigan Supreme Court to reverse the court of appeals and hold that a plaintiff who suffers successive injuries has the burden of proving a current injury was caused by the subject accident, not an independent occurrence) (Amicus Brief)
    • Bill Smith Sand & Gravel v. Alamo Twp., No. 281936 (Mich. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2008) (persuaded the Michigan Court of Appeals to expedite consideration and summarily affirm the dismissal of a local township’s challenge to the client's mining project) 
    • Moore v. Detroit Entertainment, LLC, 755 N.W.2d 686 (Mich Ct. App. 2008) (obtained affirmation of a $600,000 jury verdict for false imprisonment)
  • Administrative Appeals

    • National Wildlife Federation v. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, No. 11-123-AA (Mich. Cir. Ct. Nov. 21, 2011) (successfully persuaded the circuit court to first deny an injunction against underground mine's blasting operations pending appeal and then affirm the decision by MDEQ to grant a Part 632 non-ferrous metallic mineral mining permit)
    • Aggregate Industries - Central Region v. Waterloo Township, 09-01248-AA (Mich. Cir. Ct. July 9, 2009) (persuaded the circuit court to grant an expedited appeal, reverse the township's adverse zoning decision, and grant a special land use application to Aggregate Industries for mining)
    • National Wildlife Federation v. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, No. 08-263-AA (Mich. Cir. Ct. Mar. 3, 2009) (successfully defeated a third-party appeal of the State of Michigan land-lease to our client and achieved early dismissal of ancillary claims using cutting-edge theories of constitutional and jurisdictional law)  

Honors and Awards

  • Received the 2009 Distinguished Brief Award, recognizing advocacy in the Michigan Supreme Court
  • Senior Articles Editor, Northwestern University Law Review

Bar Associations

  • American Bar Association
    Executive Committee, Council of Appellate Lawyers, Judicial Division, Council of Appellate Lawyers
  • State Bar of Michigan
    Council for the Appellate Practice Section
  • Grand Rapids Bar Association
    Litigation Section

Languages

  • French

Professional Affiliations

  • Michigan Supreme Court's Advocates
  • Michigan Supreme Court Historical Society

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.

ACCEPTCANCEL