Skip to main content

Ahead of the Curve Auto Supplier Blog

April 12, 2013

Tensions in Korea Threaten Supply Chains

The mounting tension on the Korean Peninsula poses the risk of another global supply chain interruption. Last week, General Motor’s CEO Cliff Akerson expressed concern regarding the growing lack of stability in the Peninsula and its influence on manufacturing there. Some have even opined that North Korea’s intention is not to inflict physical harm on its neighbor but rather to inflict financial injury upon it. Whatever North Korea’s goals may be, the situation brings into sharp focus the importance of managing and protecting supply chain integrity. Building the right legal framework to support a supply chain is an essential element to ensuring its integrity in the face of global challenges. Taking an active interest in the terms and conditions of a supply agreement and winning points wherever possible in negotiations can make an enormous difference down the road when supply chain disruptions are threatened or occur.  Here are some ways to build integrity into supply chains, particularly when they are international in nature. A complete article on the issue is available here: http://wnj.com/Publications/Rising-Tensions-in-North-Korea-and-Supply-Chain-In.
  • Choosing the law that applies to the interpretation of a supply agreement and disputes arising with the supplier is critical. Whatever law is ultimately settled upon, it is most important to understand the law that applies – to contemplate how the applicable law will influence and impact the resolution of supplier disputes that may be reasonably anticipated and prepare for expected outcomes.
  • Settling upon a mechanism in a supply agreement that produces enforceable results is also imperative. There is no bilateral treaty or multilateral international convention in force between the U.S. and any other country regarding reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments from our courts. International supply agreements often call for disputes to be arbitrated. The arbitral forum as well as language and location of any arbitration should be carefully considered with assistance of counsel.
  • A buyer may prefer to see a force majeure term entirely omitted, or, if not omitted, at least buyer friendly in nature and narrowly tailored to circumstances that are addressed by its supply chain structure. Buyers prefer that supply agreements ensure that risk of loss remains with the supplier as long as possible and provides for the types of damage that will be reimbursed in event of breach. A buyer friendly termination term may also prove vital to moving on when there is a threat to supply.  

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.

ACCEPTCANCEL

Text

+ -

Reset