Skip to main content
A Better Partnership


Jul 2015
July 10, 2015

Warner Norcross Resurrects Exemption for Homeowner Transfer Tax

Homeowners in Michigan are now entitled to a refund of transfer taxes – thanks to the work of the Appellate and Supreme Court Practice attorneys at Warner Norcross & Judd LLP on a Michigan Supreme Court decision handed down yesterday.

In Gardner v Dep't of Treasury/Ngo v Dep't of Treasury/Maselli v Dep't of Treasury, Nos. 150293-5, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed a 2014 Court of Appeals decision, which will effectively put money back in the wallets of every eligible seller who qualifies for a principal residence transfer tax refund under the exemption in MCL 207.526(u).

A little background is in order: The State Real Estate Transfer Tax Act tax on recorded written instruments provided an exemption for principal residences sold when the state equalized value, or SEV, was lower at the time of sale than it was at the time of purchase—so long as the price was not something other than “true cash value.” In 2014, the Court of Appeals interpreted the exemption in such a way that it only applied when the new sale price was exactly equal to the local assessor’s true cash value determination for that year.

The petitioners paid the real estate transfer tax at a time when the SEV was lower than when they purchased it. But when they requested a refund, the Department of Treasury denied the exemption on the basis that these homeowners had sold their property for more than the current “true cash value” as determined by the local tax assessor in that property tax year.

Yesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed that decision, interpreting “true cash value” in this exemption to mean the price a buyer would pay for the property in an arm’s length transaction—not what the assessor deemed it to be for purposes of general property taxes. The Court rejected the Department of Treasury’s interpretation of SRETTA and, instead, adopted wholesale Warner’s interpretation of the Act. It further instructed the Tax Tribunal to enter judgment against the Department of Treasury, requiring Treasury to grant a refund to our clients.

If you have questions about the exemption change, please contact any of our attorneys in the following groups: Tax, Real Estate or Trusts & Estates.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -