Skip to main content
A Better Partnership


Feb 2019
February 18, 2019

Undue Influence Claims— Getting Harder to Win

A legal document is invalid if signed under such pressure that it reflects the intent of the influencer rather than the signer. 

Undue influence claims are common in cases in which a person with some level of mental decline changes their estate plan to exclude heirs or treat heirs unequally. 

The contestant typically argues that the person who benefitted from the estate plan unduly influenced the mentally declining person 
and the estate plan is invalid.  

Michigan judicial decisions reflect that it can be challenging to prove undue influence. A recent example: The Court of Appeals in November 2018 in Krum upheld the lower court’s decision dismissing the undue influence claim. Krum hammers home some important points of these claims: the person making the undue influence claim has the burden of proof, mere opportunity or motive to influence a person is not the same as actually unduly influencing a person, and speculation that the person was unduly influence is not evidence.  

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -