Skip to main content
A Better Partnership

Publications

Apr 2020
29
April 29, 2020

Infringers Beware – Supreme Court Holds Willfulness Not a Precondition for Awarding Lost Profit Damages in Trademark Infringement Actions

On April 23, 2020, the Supreme Court unanimously held in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil Group, Inc., that a plaintiff does not need to demonstrate a defendant’s trademark infringement was willful in order to recover lost profit damages. Resolving a long-standing split in courts across the United States on this issue, the Romag decision provides an easier path for trademark owners to recover lost profit damages in trademark infringement actions, and counsels more caution from alleged infringers when defending against accusations of trademark infringement.

In Romag, Fossil had an agreement to use Romag fasteners in a number of its leather goods. Romag subsequently learned, however, that Fossil’s overseas manufacturers were using counterfeit Romag fasteners, with Fossil doing little to address the problem despite requests to do so. The district and appellate court both concluded that lost profit damages were not recoverable without a finding that Fossil’s infringement was willful. The Supreme Court disagreed, reasoning that the Lanham Act, which sets remedies for federal trademark violations, requires a showing of willfulness for a trademark dilution claim, but no such requirement exists for direct trademark infringement claims.

Armed with Romag, trademark holders are provided a clearer and potentially easier path forward to recover lost profit damages for trademark infringement claims. While a defendant’s state of mind may be considered in determining whether lost profits are appropriate, requiring a showing of willfulness can no longer be a required precondition for recovery. Together with the Supreme Court’s landmark 2014 decision in Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, which has had the effect of expanding trademark owners’ ability to recover their attorneys’ fees, there has never been a better time for trademark owners to aggressively defend the valuable goodwill in their brands.

For further questions or practical advice on how to pursue or mitigate litigation risk regarding potential trademark infringement claims, please contact Brian Wassom or Michael Azzi.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.

ACCEPTCANCEL

Text

+ -

Reset