Skip to main content
A Better Partnership


May 2015
May 20, 2015

Duty to Monitor Plan Investments Never Ends, U.S. Supreme Court Holds

Failing to remove an imprudent investment may constitute a fiduciary breach separate from the selection of the investment. In Tibble v. Edison, the Supreme Court on Monday unanimously confirmed this longstanding view of many ERISA experts.

In Tibble, the court considered whether the time limit on bringing a breach of fiduciary duty claim runs from the time an investment is selected versus a later date, when the plan fiduciary fails to remove the investment. The lower courts had held the time limit runs from the date of selection. The Supreme Court disagreed, holding that fiduciaries must exercise a “continuing duty of prudence” in monitoring existing plan investments.

The Supreme Court remanded this case for the lower court to consider whether a breach occurred now that the claim is not barred by time. The lower court will now have to determine if the failure to remove higher cost mutual fund share classes from the plan’s investment menu constitutes a fiduciary breach and what corresponding liability, if any, the plan fiduciary has.

This case is significant for anyone responsible for selecting and monitoring a tax-qualified plan’s investments. It confirms that the duty to monitor investments is ongoing and plan fiduciaries may be liable for losses incurred from the failure to remove imprudent investments.

Plan fiduciaries responsible for monitoring should understand this ongoing duty exists regardless of the prudence exercised at the time of selection or their role in the selection. They can ensure this responsibility is met by following a process that involves regularly reviewing the prudence of plan investments and removing those that do not meet the plan’s investment criteria.

To read the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, click here.

If you have any questions about this development, please contact your Warner Norcross & Judd employee benefits attorney.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -