Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
September 25, 2017

MSC to consider whether county's authority to site buildings trumps township's zoning authority

The Michigan Supreme Court has granted leave to appeal the question of whether a county's use of a shooting range has priority over a township's ordinance in Coloma Charter Township v. Berrien County, No. 154556 and No. 154557.  This appeal derived from the discussion of whether a county’s authority under the county commissioner's act ("CCA") to “site” and “erect” buildings has priority over zoning ordinance of the township with respect to using open-air, three-sided structure within which the Berrien County Sheriff’s Department conducts firearms training for law enforcement officers.  After the county was enjoined from using outdoor shooting ranges for firearms training for law enforcement officers, the county passed a resolution allowing it to construct an open-air, pole-barn style structure consisting of a covered cement slab that was completely open on one side, facing the shooting ranges.  The circuit could concluded that the county’s authority under the CCA to site the county building trumped the township’s zoning and noise ordinances. 

The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that a county’s authority to “site” and “erect” buildings is limited to items specifically adapted to support the use of the buildings, such as parking lots, shrubs, and lighting.  Because shooting ranges are not a normal and indispensable use of county buildings, a shooting range does not qualify as an ancillary item under the CCA.

The Michigan Supreme Court has granted leave to appeal the following issues: 

(1) whether the gun range is given priority under the CCA over a conflicting township zoning ordinance;
(2) if so, whether the Court of Appeals erred by reversing the Berrien Circuit Court’s revision of the existing permanent injunction based on changed circumstances; and
(3) whether the Court of Appeals properly vacated the trial court’s decision to deny the plaintiffs’ request for attorney fees.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -