Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
September 01, 2010

COA Opinion: Arbitrary time limit for witness testimony constitutes an abuse of discretion

On August 31, 2010, the Court of Appeals published its per curiam decision in Barksdale v. Bert's Martketplace, No. 290329, where plaintiff challenged the conduct of a sexual harassment trial where the the judge limited the testimony of the owner of the defendant business to a half-hour per side, and ended plaintiff counsel's direct examination of that witness at the end of that time, not allowing re-direct or an offer of proof. The Court of Appeals found the time limitation to be arbitrary under the circumstances of this case, as it was unrelated to the complexity of the case or the time taken for other witnesses. Additionally, the Court of Appeals found that the trial court's failure to take an offer of proof meant that there was no record that would permit a finding of harmless error, meaning the case would have to be reversed and remanded for a new trial as a result of the trial court's abuse of discretion.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.

ACCEPTCANCEL

Text

+ -

Reset