Skip to main content
A Better Partnership

October 2012

Oct 2012
October 18, 2012

COA Opinion: Insurance Policy's "employee dishonesty" provision covered loss sustained when employee issued herself extra paychecks

In Amerisure Insurance Company v. Debruyn Produce Company, the Court of Appeals held that the losses Debruyn sustained when its employee issued herself unauthorized checks were covered under the 'employee dishonesty' portion of Debruyn's insurance policy with Amerisure. When executing her payroll responsibilities for the c

Oct 2012
October 11, 2012

MSC Order List: October 10, 2012

In lieu of granting leave to appeal in People v. Duncan, Nos. 145974-5, the Michigan Supreme Court remanded these cases to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted, and directed the Court of Appeals to expedite its consideration of these cases. The Michigan Supreme Court also granted the motion for stay of the trial court

Oct 2012
October 03, 2012

COA Opinion: Non-renewal of an employment contract may constitute an adverse employment action under the WPA

In Wurtz v. Beecher Metropolitan District, the Court of Appeals held that failure to renew an employment contract could constitute an 'adverse employment action' under the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA). The WPA allows an employee to bring an action against his employer or former employer if he was engaged in a 'protected act

Displaying results 13-18 (of 20)
 |<  <  1 - 2 - 3 - 4  >  >| 

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -