Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
October 25, 2012

COA Opinion: No-fault insurer properly denied coverage to vehicle owner who was an excluded driver

In Bronson Methodist Hospital v Michigan Assigned Claims Facility, the Michigan Court of Appeals upheld a no-fault insurer's denial of PIP coverage to an injured registered owner of a vehicle who was also an excluded driver under the insurance policy. The court applied the plain language of the insurance policy's 'named driver exclusion endorsement' and the no-fault statute, and found that the excluded driver's 'act of driving the insured vehicle at the time of the accident rendered the vehicle uninsured.' Relying on Iqbal v Bristol West Ins Group, Plaintiff argued that a vehicle owner is covered by a no-fault policy even when, as here, someone else insures the vehicle. The Court of appeals distinguished Iqbal on grounds that the vehicle owner in that case was not an excluded driver. The Court affirmed the trial court's grant of summary disposition in favor of the insurer and the Michigan Assigned Claims Facility (MACF).

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -