Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
May 24, 2017

MSC grants MOAA to consider scope of landlord’s statutory duty to ensure that internal stairways are “fit for the use intended by the parties” and in “reasonable repair”

In Martin v. Milham Meadows, No.154360, the Michigan Supreme Court granted mini-oral argument as to whether reasonable minds could differ regarding whether an internal stairway, which was overly slippery because of the paint applied, was fit for its intended use and kept in reasonable repair. 

After Michael Martin slipped on the internal basement stairs in his rented townhouse, he sued his apartment complex and its management company, asserting that they breached their duties under MCL 554.139 to ensure that the stairs were fit for their intended use and to keep the stairs in reasonable repair.  The trial court dismissed Martin’s complaint, finding that, given Martin’s familiarity with the stairs, there was no question of fact as to whether the stairs were unfit, kept in reasonable repair, or so unreasonably dangerous to avoid the open and obvious doctrine.  The Court of Appeals reversed as to Martin’s statutory claims, holding that reasonable minds could differ regarding whether Martin’s basement stairway was appropriate for everyday use given its inherent slipperiness.  Specifically, the court noted that “[w]hile ice and snow are expected conditions in a parking lot during a Michigan winter, interior stairways are intended to provide safe and secure access from one level of a building to another.”

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -