Skip to main content
A Better Partnership

May 2011

May 2011
26
May 26, 2011

COA Opinion: 'Loss of market advantage' is not an element of damages under the Uniform Condemnation Procedures Act

In Charter Township of Lyon v McDonald's USA, LLC, No. 294074, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's judgment that compensated a commercial developer for its intangible property interest in an easement in one of its condominium units that was taken under the Uniform Condemnation Procedures Act ('UCPA'). Judge O'Connell authored the majority opinion, and J

May 2011
24
May 24, 2011

MSC Opinion: Circuit courts have subject matter jurisdiction over appeals from State Tax Commission classification decisions

On May 23, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership v Robert Naftaly, Case Nos. 140814, 140817-140823. The Court concluded that the final sentence of MCL 211.34c(6), which prevents judicial review of a State Tax Commission ('sTC') decision, is unconstitutional. Accordingly, the Court s

May 2011
24
May 24, 2011

MSC Order List: May 23, 2011

On May 23, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an order in the case of Bronson Mehtodist Hospital v. Allstate Insurance Company, Case No. 140301, correcting a clerical error in the original May 20, 2011 order denying leave to appeal. The May 20, 2011 order should have included a notation that Justice Marilyn Kelly would reverse the Court of Appe

May 2011
24
Displaying results 7-12 (of 32)
 |<  <  1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6  >  >| 

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.

ACCEPTCANCEL

Text

+ -

Reset