Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
March 07, 2010

COA Opinion: Despite parental-right termination child-support obligations continue

On March 4, 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued its published opinion in Department of Human Services v. Beck (In re Beck), No. 293138.' The court held that the trial court properly terminated father-respondentƒ''s parental rights while continuing his child-support obligations.' The courtƒ''s opinion may be found here.

Father-respondent did not appeal the order terminating his parental rights; he appealed only the continuation of his child-support obligations, arguing that his due-process rights were violated.' However, he failed to explain how his procedural or substantive due-process rights were violated.' Consequently, the court instead inquired into whether the trial court had the authority to terminate parental rights while preserving child-support obligations.

The court noted that MCL '' 712A.19b permits courts to terminate parental rights, but is silent regarding child-support obligations.' It is well settled that parents have an obligation to support their children.' No Michigan statute links the two, and public policy counsels against releasing parents from their obligation' to support their children. Thus, the court held that a parent has a responsibility to support his child, regardless of whether he continues to hold parental rights.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -