Skip to main content
A Better Partnership

March 2010

Mar 2010
March 30, 2010

U.S. Supreme Court rejects habeas claim that Kent County's method of selecting a jury systematically excluded African-Americans

Today the United States Supreme Court, in Berghuis v. Smith, No. 08-1402,' unanimously reversed a decision by the U.S. ' Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. ' In so doing, it concluded that the Michigan Supreme Court had reasonably applied federal law concerning whether a Kent County jury in a murder trial was drawn from a fair cross section of the community. ' The U.S. Supreme Court, in

Mar 2010
March 27, 2010

MSC Orders: March 26, 2010

On March 26, 2010, the Court denied leave to appeal in four cases, including Lighthouse Place Development, LLC v. Moorings Association, No. 139015, in which the Court had granted leave and heard oral argument. In Lighthouse Place, the Court concluded that the questions presented regarding the standard fo

Mar 2010
March 26, 2010

COA Opinion: Wayne County was not immune from suits for sewage back-ups when it received notice of a sewage event but did not inform the affected residents how to file a claim

In Dybata v. County of Wayne, Nos. 283413 & 283414 (published Mar. 25, 2010), the Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Jansen, concluded that Wayne County did not qualify for governmental immunity under MCL ' 691.1419 again

Displaying results 1-6 (of 33)
 |<  < 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6  >  >| 

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -