Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
March 02, 2009

MSC: Oral Arguments & Hearings This Week

The Michigan Supreme Court will hold oral arguments this week in nine separate matters on Tuesday and Wednesday. This is only the second week of oral arguments this year (and the second set of oral arguments since Justice Hathaway joined the Court). On Thursday, the Court will hold its third public administrative conference to approve rules for administrative conferences, address the appointment of a chief judge for the Genesee County Probate Court, and address rules changes that were previously addressed. The rules changes to be considered include whether to publish a proposal or several proposals for procedures for disqualification of a Supreme Court Justice. The agenda for the administrative conference can be found here.

The argument schedule is as follows:

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

  • Henry v. The Dow Chemical Company: Standard for class certification. Oral argument summary here.
  • People v. Bryant: Scope of testimonial hearsay. Oral argument summary here.
  • Hunter v. Hunter: Constitutional challenge to current standard for parental fitness. Oral argument summary here.
  • Attorney General v. MPSC: Electric rate setting. Oral argument summary here.
  • Selflube Inc. v. JJMT Inc.: ERISA. Oral argument summary here.

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

  • Potter v. Murray: Whether a radiology group is a health facility or agency which must receive a notice of intent to sue as a prerequisite to a medical malpractice claim. Oral argument summary here.
  • In re Hudson: Termination of parental rights. Oral argument summary here.
  • In re Servaas: Judicial Tenure Commission action to remove district judge from office. Oral argument summary here.
  • In re Lee: Termination of parental rights within under the Indian Child Welfare Act. Oral argument summary here.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -