Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
June 09, 2017

COA Interprets Earth Movement Exclusion As Applying to Any Earth Movement

In Home-Owners Insurance Co. v. Dominic F. Adnriacchi, No. 331260, the Court of Appeals held the plain language of an insurance contract excluding damage cause by “any earth movement” meant what it said and did not apply only to natural earth movement.  
 
After extensive roadwork nearby caused damages to the insured’s law offices from the earth re-settling, the insurance provider denied the claim as falling under their “any earth movement” exclusion. In deciding this issue of first impression on this particular contract language, the Court affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary disposition for the insurance provider and held that the plain language of the policy clearly meant to exclude both natural and man-made earth movement from the policy, taking a broader approach than some courts in other jurisdictions.  
 

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.

ACCEPTCANCEL

Text

+ -

Reset