Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
June 17, 2009

COA Opinion: Car Dealer's $1 Million Liability Policy is Primary Insurance for Accident During Test Drive

On June 16, 2009, in Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v Martin, No. 281482, the Court of Appeals issued a per curiam opinion finding that the full $1 million policy limit on a used car dealer's garage liability insurance policy was the primary insurance for an accident occurring during a test drive. In doing so, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's ruling that the garage liability insurer's primary liability was limited to $20,000.

This ruling results from a declaratory judgment action filed by Auto-Owners (the garage liability insurer) to establish the insurance obligations for this accident. The trial court concluded that Auto-Owners was primarily liable for the first $20,000, and that State Farm (the driver's personal insurer) was then liable for any amount in excess of $20,000, up to its policy limit of $100,000. This ruling was based on an exclusion in the Auto-Owners policy that stated that customers were not insureds under the policy if there was other insurance that satisfied the limits required by the applicable motor vehicle financial responsibility law; and that if there was no such other insurance, the Auto-Owners policy would not pay more than the the limits required by the applicable motor vehicle financial responsibility law. It was undisputed that, under well-established Michigan precedent, Auto-Owners' exclusion was invalid because of the No-Fault Act's requirement that the vehicle owner's policy provide at least $20,000 of primary residual liability coverage for use of a vehicle. But, the trial court concluded that the language of the Auto-Owners policy limited the primary coverage to $20,000.

The Court of Appeals disagreed. It concluded that, given that Auto-Owners knew (or should have known) of the invalidity of its exclusion, the Auto-Owners policy language was ambiguous, and thus insufficient to limit primary coverage to $20,000. Thus, the Court of Appeal held that Auto-Owners is primarily liable up to its full $1 million policy limit. In addition, the Court of Appeals noted that this result comported with the historical precendent establishing that a vehicle owner is responsible for paying for residual liability benefits.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.

ACCEPTCANCEL

Text

+ -

Reset