Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
July 01, 2009

COA Opinion: Failure to Place Defendant Under Oath When Accepting a Plea Does Not Require Automatic Reversal

On June 30, 2009 the Court of Appeals approved its April 2009 opinion in People v. Plumaj, No. 285534, for publication. In April, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's granting of a motion to set aside a defendant's guilty and nolo contendre pleas to various offenses. The trial court concluded that because the defendant was not placed under oath, the oath requirement of MCR 6.203(A) had been violated and the pleas needed to be set aside. The Court of Appeals disagreed. It concluded the legal question for accepting a plea is whether it was understanding, voluntary, and accurate. Thus, the trial court erred by setting aside the pleas based solely upon failure to strictly comply with MCR 6.302(A) when it did not make any inquiry as to whether the pleas were understanding, voluntary and accurate.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -