Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
January 31, 2014

COA holds that a medical malpractice expert witness does not need identical expertise as the doctor

An expert witness in a medical malpractice case does not need "identical experience and expertise" as the defendant in order to testify about whether the defendant complied with the standard of care. MCL 600.2169(2) instructs the court to consider an expert's area of specialization when evaluating whether an expert is qualified to render an opinion. Albro v Drayer involved a failed ankle surgery. The defendant's experts had considerable experience with ankle reconstruction, but they did not have significant experience with the particular procedure at issue in the case. The Court of Appeals held that the experts satisfied the requirements of MCL 600.2169(2) because they were experts in the same general field as the procedure at issue in the case. A lack of significant experience with the specific procedure would go towards the weight of their opinions, not the admissibility. 

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -