Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
January 09, 2013

COA Opinion: Prisoner serving a life sentence is not entitled to parole for the purpose of deportation

A Michigan statute (MCL 791.234b) provides that a state prisoner shall be paroled and released to the federal government for purposes of deportation if the individual was (1) not serving that sentence for particular enumerated crimes; (2) was subject to a final order of deportation; and (3) had "served at least 1/2 of the minimum sentence imposed by the court." In Chico-Polo v Dep't of Corrections, the Court of Appeals addressed the applicability of statute to a prisoner that met the first two conditions of the statute, but was serving a life sentence. The prisoner argued that because he had served ten years, and would be eligible for parole after 20 years, he had served half of the minimum sentence. The Court disagreed. It found that the statute requires that the prisoner serve half the minimum sentence "imposed by the court" and that, here, the criminal trial court had not imposed a minimum sentence, but instead imposed a life sentence. Judge Boonstra agreed with the result of the per curiam opinion of Judges Hoekstra and Borrello, but found, in a concurring opinion, that the statute was vague as applied to this situation and that, as such, the prisoner did not meet the high bar required in his mandamus action seeking release under the statute because he could not demonstrate the required "clear legal right" to the action sought.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -