Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
February 07, 2009

MSC Order List: February 6, 2009

On February 6, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court took substantive action in four criminal cases. In People v. Grays, No. 137244, the Court vacated the defendant's conviction of second-degree murder. In the other three cases, the Court ordered oral argument on whether to grant the application for leave to appeal or take other substantive action. This is also known as granting "miniature oral argument" or MOA because the parties are given 30 minutes for oral argument instead of the 60 minutes provided in calendar cases. The Court also denied leave to appeal in three cases.

All three cases involve sentencing issues:

People v. Kircher, No. 137652: The Court ordered a MOA to address whether a criminal violation of Michigan's Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act ("NREPA") requires the imposition of a determinate five-year sentence where the defendant poses or posed a substantial endangerment to the public health, safety, or welfare, or whether the inclusion of that NREPA in the list of felonies to which the guidelines for minimum sentences apply requires the imposition of an indeterminate sentence. The Court invited amicus briefs from the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan. Oral argument will be scheduled in April 2009.

People v. Holder, No. 137486: The Court ordered a MOA on whether the judgment of sentence was valid when imposed and whether the trial court lacked authority to modify the judgment of sentence. The Michigan Attorney General was further ordered to explain under what authority the Michigan Department of Corrections may proceed ex parte to amend an otherwise final order. Oral argument will be scheduled for April 2009.

People v. Lowe, No. 137284: The Court ordered a MOA regarding whether a minimum recommended sentence may be doubled as a sentence enhancement. The Court invited amicus briefs from the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan. Oral argument will be scheduled in April 2009.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.

ACCEPTCANCEL

Text

+ -

Reset