Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
December 01, 2014

MSC teaches lesson regarding merits practice

After full merits briefing and oral argument, the Michigan Supreme Court denied leave as improvidently granted in a multi-million-dollar commercial contract dispute, Service Source Inc. v. DHL Express (USA), Inc., No. 301013. The result teaches a valuable lesson about merits practice before the Court.

Plaintiff Service Source was a shipping reseller that obtained preferential wholesale shipping rates with DHL, then resold DHL's shipping services to smaller customers at a rate higher than Service Source's wholesale rate, but lower than the retail rate those customers would have ordinarily paid.  When DHL terminated all domestic service in the U.S. market, Service Source lost its valuable business.

Service Source sued for breach of contract, successfully moved for summary disposition on liability, and obtained a multi-million-dollar damage judgment following a bench trial.  The Court of Appeals affirmed.  The Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal on the question of liability, the calculation of damages, and whether the parties' agreement constituted a requirements contract.

In addition to addressing the substance of these three issues, Service Source continued to insist in its merits briefing that leave was improvidently granted because all of the legal issues were controlled by Florida law, and there was nothing jurisprudentially significant about the trial court's rulings.  The Justices echoed these points at oral argument, and the Court ultimately denied leave to appeal.  The moral of the story?  It is never too late to persuade the Court that a case lacks jurisprudential significance, even after leave has been granted and the case has proceeded to merits arguments.

Disclaimer:  Warner Norcross & Judd represented Service Source, the successful appellee, in this case.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -