Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
December 01, 2014

MSC grants mini-oral argument to consider whether prematurely filed medical-malpractice complaints may be amended to render them timely

The Michigan Supreme Court will hear mini-oral argument on whether a plaintiff may amend a medical-malpractice complaint filed before the expiration of the mandatory 182-day notice period in MCL 600.2912b(1) to render it timely. The Michigan Supreme Court is considering the applications for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals’ judgments in Tyra v. Organ Procurement Agency of Michigan, No. 148087, and Furr v. McLeod, No. 149344.  The Court ordered that the mini-oral argument for Tyra and Furr be scheduled for the same session, as the parties to both cases must address whether Driver v. Naini, 490 Mich. 239 (2011), overruled Zwiers v. Growney, 286 Mich. App. 38 (2009).  In Driver, the Michigan Supreme Court held that a plaintiff may not amend a notice of intent to add nonparty defendants so that the amended notice relates back to the original filing for purposes of tolling the statute of limitations.  In Zwiers, the Court of Appeals allowed a trial court to apply MCL 600.2301, the statute allowing amendment, to prevent dismissal for failing to comply with the mandatory notice period in medical-malpractice cases.  As discussed here, the Court of Appeals previously convened a conflict panel in Furr and concluded that Driver did not overrule Zwiers.  In Tyra, the parties must also address whether the defendant’s affirmative defenses were defective because they did not specifically state the grounds for the defense.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -