Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
December 05, 2014

COA holds that Sewage Act and GTLA do not apply to natural rainwater flooding

The Michigan Court of Appeals in Fingerle v. City of Ann Arbor, No 310352 held that, absent a governmental action that diverts rain water onto private property, merely constructing drainage infrastructure will not lead to governmental liability when property is damaged by the natural flow of rain water.
Lawrence Fingerle owned a home in an Ann Arbor Subdivision which historically was prone to flooding. In order to reduce the flooding, Ann Arbor built drainage infrastructure in the early 1990’s: this drainage system largely decreased the flooding in the area. Fingerle, however, was unaware of the flooding risk, and completed a finished basement in 2002, which was then flooded during a large rain storm in 2010. Fingerle argued that the Michigan Sewage Act (MCL 691.1416-1419) and the Governmental Tort Liability Act (GTLA) (MCL 691.1401 et seq) allowed him to recover from Ann Arbor for the damage done to his basement. His claim stemmed largely from Ann Arbor informing residents that it would build drainage infrastructure of a certain size, and apparently, it did not comport with the stated dimensions.
The Court’s opinion sternly disagreed. It first held that under a plain reading of the Sewage Act, “it does not . . . apply to any events that exclusively involve rainwater [and do not involve] the collection treatment, and disposal of waste sewage and industrial waste.” Further, the Court determined, that Fingerle’s complaint was mainly a contract action, that did not permit recovery under either the GTLA or the Sewage Act, and that such claims were not even remotely possible.  The Court stated, “What emerges from [Fingerle’s] claim is a cause of action that sounds in contract, not tort. Remove the words, there is no duty. Remove the words, there is no defect. Remove the words, there is no causation.”
Therefore, the Court, fearful of increasing governmental liability to actions based in contract and expanding the legislative intent of Sewage Act and the GTLA, dismissed Fingerle’s claim.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -