Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
April 08, 2014

MSC to hear further argument on the validity of Wayne County’s ordinance limiting fund reserves and distributions for retirees

In its battle over millions in public employee retirement benefits (see earlier blog of COA opinion here), the Employee Retirement System has so far preserved its lower-court defeat of Wayne County’s ordinance, avoiding the peremptory reversal that often follows a mini-oral argument on the application.  Now on to the full briefing . . . .  The MSC ordered the parties to address on leave granted  the following issues:
(1) an identification of the source and nature of the County’s
power to move funds from the Inflation Equity Fund (IEF);

(2) whether the movement of IEF assets to the defined benefit plan without the corresponding offset to the County’s Annual Required Contribution violates the Public Employee Retirement System Investment Act (PERSIA), MCL 38.1132 et seq.; and

(3) whether the movement of $32 million in IEF assets to the defined benefit plan constitutes a “transaction” within the meaning of MCL 38.1133(8). 

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -