Skip to main content
A Better Partnership
April 30, 2014

COA calls for special panel on whether "open and obvious" doctrine should apply to hazards in store aisles

In Quinto v. Woodward Detroit CVS, LLCthe Court of Appeals upheld summary disposition in favor of a defendant for plaintiff's claim for injuries resulting from falling over platform in the aisle of a store.  The Court concluded that this result was compelled by earlier Court of Appeals' authority that applied the "open and obvious" doctrine to bar a claim under similar facts.  This doctrine holds that a property owner is not responsible to protect invitees from conditions that an average person would discover upon casual inspection.  The majority of this panel, however, disagreed with the earlier Court of Appeals precedent and argued that a proper analysis of Michigan Supreme Court authority suggests that the protections of the open and obvious doctrine should not apply to floor-level hazards in store aisles, particularly where that aisle contains advertising designed to capture customer's attention.  The majority, therefore requested a special conflict panel pursuant to MCR 7.215(J)(2).  Judge Cavanaugh dissented, arguing that the possibility of distraction in a store aisle was not sufficient to create a unique duty for store owners to protect customers from open and obvious conditions.  

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.



+ -