Skip to main content

Publications

Aug 2013
16
August 16, 2013

Discovery Nixed in Private International Arbitration


The potential availability of discovery is one of the many issues to consider when determining whether to include a mandatory arbitration provision in a contract for an international transaction. A recent decision by a federal court in California, which held that third-party discovery is not available for private arbitration, is a good reminder of the importance of addressing the availability of discovery when drafting arbitration provisions.

In the case, Dubey, a Taiwanese company with a California-based affiliate, instituted an arbitration proceeding before the American Arbitration Association’s International Centre for Dispute Resolution to enforce an indemnification provision against several individuals. One of the individuals sought an order compelling the Taiwanese company to produce various documents for use in the arbitration. Specifically, the individual sought an order under a statute that gives federal courts discretion to order discovery for use in a “foreign or international tribunal.”

The court denied the order, holding that private arbitration does not constitute a “foreign or international tribunal” and noting that permitting discovery in private arbitration would defeat the timeliness and cost-effectiveness of arbitration. 

The availability of discovery is one item that should be addressed when entering into an agreement with a foreign entity that mandates resolving disputes by arbitration. As discussed in Dubey, there is a split of authority as to whether third-party discovery is available in the context of private arbitration. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has not directly addressed the issue in Dubey.

In any event, addressing discovery issues at the outset can be an effective means of increasing the likelihood that arbitration is timely and cost-effective without limiting the availability of meaningful discovery.

If you have questions about cross-border disputes, please contact Jeffrey Dornbos, (jdornbos@wnj.com or 616.396.3260), International Dispute Resolution Practice Group Chair Brian Lang (blang@wnj.com or 231.727.2612) or another member of the International Dispute Resolution Practice Group at Warner Norcross & Judd.

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.

ACCEPTCANCEL

Text

+ -

Reset