Skip to main content

One Court of Justice Blog

Nov 2016
14
November 14, 2016

COA holds that no signature is required in a will if clear and convincing evidence establishes decedent intended the document to constitute his or her will

In Re Attia Estate, No. 327925, the Court of Appeals held the probate court erred by concluding that an unsigned will cannot be admitted to probate as a matter of law. The sole issue presented on appeal was whether a decedent must sign a will in order for that will to be admitted to probate.

Sep 2016
22
September 22, 2016

COA: Probate inventory fee must be paid if estate has sufficient assets, even if it means selling the personal representative’s home

The probate inventory fee required under Michigan law is paid from the assets of the estate, not from the personal representative’s own funds, says the Michigan Court of Appeals in consolidated appeals in In re Estate of DeCoste, Nos. 327990 and 327993. The personal representative’s inability to pay is therefore irrelevant to the waiver or suspension of this fee. If the estate’s only property is a single real estate asset, then the personal representative must liquidate it to pay the fee, even if the personal representative is living in that home.

Jul 2016
06
July 06, 2016

Michigan Supreme Court to Consider Enforceability of Wills Benefiting the Drafting Attorney

The Michigan Supreme Court will hear oral argument on the application in In re Mardigian, No. 152655, to consider whether to overrule In re Powers Estate, 375 Mich 150 (1965).  In re Powers Estate holds that a Michigan court may enforce a will that devises most of the decedent’s estate to the attorney who drafted it, subject only to the presumption that the drafting attorney exercised undue influence over the testator. 

May 2016
27
May 27, 2016

COA holds that a spouse be must willfully and physical absent from her decedent spouse for at least a year before death to be disqualified from electing against the decedent's will

In Lovett v. Peterson, No. 326017, the Michigan Court of Appeals upheld a Houghton Probate Court decision that a wife who was physically separated from her husband for many years while he lived with his mistress was not “willfully absent” under the testate spousal election statute MCL 700.2801(2)(e)(i).

Displaying results 1-6 (of 46)
 |<  < 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8  >  >| 

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.

ACCEPTCANCEL

Text

+ -

Reset