Skip to main content

One Court of Justice Blog

September 29, 2017

MSC to consider whether of evidence from past medical malpractice cases is relevant under MRE 404(b)

The Michigan Supreme Court has granted mini-oral argument in Merchand v. Carpenter, No. 154622, to consider whether evidence from a defendant doctor’s past medical malpractice cases are relevant under MRE 404(b).  This case arose out of a medical malpractice action filed by Patricia Merchand against Richard Carpenter, M.D., and Mid-Michigan Ear, Nose, and Throat, P.C. for a permanent injury to the nerve that controls movement of the tongue.  At trial, Merchand sought to introduce evidence of Dr. Carpenter's past medical malpractice cases in order to show his scheme, plan, or system of creating medical records that did not accurately reflect his interactions with patients where surgeries resulted in serious complications.  The trial court prohibited any testimony regarding the parallels between this case and records in Dr. Carpenter's past medical malpractices cases, and the jury found Dr. Carpenter not professionally negligent.  The Court of Appeals vacated the jury's verdict, holding that while evidence of Dr. Carpenter's recordkeeping in past malpractice cases could not be used to attack his credibility or to show character or propensity, it could properly be used to show that he followed a particular pattern when it came to cases with serious complications resulting from surgery. 
 

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.

ACCEPTCANCEL

Text

+ -

Reset