Skip to main content

January 2013

Jan 2013
25
January 25, 2013

MSC Order List: January 24, 2013

The Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in People v Duncan, limited to the question of whether a 'witness was 'unavailable' for the purposes of MRE 804(a).' The Court also vacated as dicta the portions of the opinions below that address 'whether the admission of the complainant's preliminary examination testimony would viola

Jan 2013
21
January 21, 2013

MSC Order List: January 18, 2013

The Michigan Supreme Court denied 11 applications for leave, and remanded three matters to the Court of Appeals or trial court. In Michigan Insurance Company v. National Liability & Fire Insurance Company, the Supreme Court summarily reversed the Court of Appeals' holding that an adult foster care home resident was covered on the home's no-fault insurance polic

Jan 2013
18
January 18, 2013

COA Opinion: Tortious interference with contract requires proof of intent to induce breach of contract

In Knight Enterprises, Inc. v. RPF Oil Co., the Michigan Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's judgment in favor of the plaintiff, because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the defendant instigated the breach of contract. In this case, the plaintiff supplied gasoline to a gas station under a 10-year fuel supply agreement. The gas station owner breached

Jan 2013
18
January 18, 2013

COA Opinion: Government liable for car-accident victim's lost wages and service expenses

In Hannay v Department of Transportation, an employee of the Department of Transportation failed to obey a stop sign and hit Heather Lynn Hannay. Hannay was seriously injured and sued the Department. Hannay sought damages for lost wages and service expenses allowed by the No-Fault Act. The Department argued that the Government Tort Liability Act ('G

Jan 2013
16
January 16, 2013

COA Opinion: Sentencing variable for exploitation of a vulnerable victim is appropriate where the defendant did not have contact with victims

In People v. Needham, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that a child pornography sentence may be enhanced pursuant to OV-10 for exploitation of a vulnerable victim even though the defendant never had contact with the victims. The court reasoned that, because the images were of real children, the defendant exploited and manipulated these vulnerable victims by posse

Displaying results 7-12 (of 21)
 |<  <  1 - 2 - 3 - 4  >  >| 

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.

ACCEPTCANCEL

Text

+ -

Reset