Seminar Will Help Automotive Suppliers Compete in the Evolving Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Market

Warner Norcross & Judd and the Original Equipment Suppliers Association (OESA) are co-hosting a June 3 seminar crafted for automotive suppliers, to provide legal strategies to keep pace with the rapidly changing business and technology issues in the auto industry. The event, “IP Insights for a New Era of Innovation: Five Strategies to Keep Pace with Emerging Technology and Ahead of Competitors,” will be held from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. at the Hotel Baronette Renaissance, in Novi. 
Read More

Federal Agency Considers Rule Changes That Could Alter the Meaning of Vehicle Ownership

The proliferation of data-driven devices has fueled a high-stakes debate over whether automotive and agricultural manufacturing companies that create and license software should retain ownership and control of source code after consumers take possession of the products.  Read More

Foreign Companies Considering a U.S. Presence Need a Good Game Plan

With the SAE World Congress in Detroit this week, automotive executives from all over the world are getting a taste (some for the first time) of what the United States, and specifically Michigan and Detroit, have to offer. Many foreign-owned automotive companies already have a presence in the U.S. and new companies are setting up shop here on a nearly daily basis. If you work at a company that is considering a U.S. presence, it’s important to know there are multiple ways to accomplish this. Establishing a presence in the U.S. is not a one-size-fits-all proposition.  Read More

Steer Clear of Antitrust Laws When Protecting Intellectual Property

Automotive suppliers pay a significant amount of attention to protecting their intellectual property when reviewing and negotiating terms and conditions, and rightfully so. As part of that review, suppliers should also pay attention to the intersection between intellectual property rights and antitrust laws. The federal government grants a patent holder the right to a monopoly in the patented technology, but there are limits to that monopoly.  Read More

SEC Enforcement Action on Confidentiality Agreement is Cause for Concern

Do confidentiality agreements create a liability for your company? A recent Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforcement action suggests the answer to that question is “yes.”

On April 1, 2015, the SEC announced that it had entered into a settlement with a Houston-based global technology and engineering firm, KBR Inc. At issue was the confidentiality agreements KBR required its employees to sign in connection with an internal investigation.Do confidentiality agreements create a liability for your company? A recent Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforcement action suggests the answer to that question is “yes.” Read More
Displaying results 1-5 (of 95)
 |<  < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  >  >| 

NOTICE. Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you.

By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.

Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.